Social media smears against teachers on rise. [ Irish Independent, by Kim Bielenberg, 15/1/2014 ] .

Earlier this month, the growing problem reached the High Court in Dublin when Twitter was ordered to remove “grossly defamatory and offensive” pictures and tweets about an Irish teacher.

The female teacher, based in the Middle East, was featured in a Twitter profile with sexually explicit posts. She told the court she had not created or had anything to do with the profile, which had caused her a great deal of stress and alarm.

The Twitter profile has since been removed.

It is not clear who created the defamatory posts, but there are a growing number of cases where teachers are becoming the targets of abuse.

Pat King, general secretary of secondary teachers’ union the ASTI, said: “There is a definite increase in the number of teachers and members of school staff contacting the ASTI for advice in relation to Facebook, YouTube and Twitter postings by students.”

Among the recent problems dealt with by the ASTI were:

* Students setting up impostor Facebook accounts in a teacher’s name.

* Derogatory comments by students on social media.

* Students filming or taking photos of teachers using mobile phones.

A fairly thick skin has always been an essential trait for those working at the chalkface.

Teachers have always had to tolerate anonymous abuse posted on blackboards or graffiti on the back of toilet doors.

For almost a decade, they have also had to put up with anonymous rankings and comments on RateMyTeacher.com.

When lurid sexual comments and pictures are published to the world on the internet, the depth of hurt can be that much deeper.

Mr King says: “Material which constitutes malicious gossip, harassment, humiliation or defamation can have a serious impact on a teacher.”

Social media abuse can lead to expulsions or suspensions. In July 2012, four pupils at Oatlands College in Dublin were expelled after abusive remarks about two teachers were posted on Facebook. Two of the students were reinstated on appeal.

Twenty-eight students at Colaiste Chiaráin in Croom, Co Limerick, were suspended last year after they “liked” an explicit post about a teacher on Facebook.

So what can a teacher or principal do if they become a target of abuse?

If they know the perpetrator, they can tell them to remove the material and tell the principal. One of the problems is that the defamatory posts may be anonymous.

Kate Colleary of Eversheds Solicitors says: “Teachers who are the target of abuse should contact the website to ask for the posts to be taken down.

“If the material is defamatory, sites should act to remove it, otherwise they could be liable for damages.”

Mr King says: “It is vital that students understand there are boundaries in relation to what they can post about any individual (including their teachers) on these platforms.

“Schools should have clear and robust statements setting out what the school regards as unacceptable online behaviour,” says Mr King.

Social media sites are so pervasive that a complete ban in schools is not always practical. Many schools use sites such as Twitter and Facebook as learning tools.

It is also questionable whether a blanket ban would have that much effect. Even if students are banned completely from using social media in school, damaging material can easily be posted about teachers outside school hours.

Eton bans Snapchat over concerns it could be used for sexting. [ The Independent, by Adam Withnall, 5/1/2014 ].

The messaging service, which deletes images and videos after they have been viewed and whose CEO recently rejected a $3 billion takeover bid from Facebook, has unwittingly developed a reputation for being used as a platform for sexting.

As a result, the app has now been added to a list of programmes which are blocked on the school’s wireless network – though that won’t necessarily stop boys getting their hands on it altogether.

Headmaster Tony Little told the SundayTelegraph: “It is blocked from the Eton wireless internet system.”

He added: “Boys can still use it via the 3G phone network, but we hope that blocking it on our network will, at least, make them think twice.

“This is part of our continuing effort to educate boys in the sensible use of technology.”

Eton has previously said it doesn’t want to be the “last dinosaur standing” when it comes to the use of and education about technology in schools. In November the head of the school’s online team, Percy Harrison, told theTimes they were working on collaborating with London-based tech entrepreneurs, and said: “Twenty years from now what happens in school will be dramatically different.”

Snapchat has recently suffered from security concerns after a group of hackers posted the account details of more than 4.6 million users online.

Last year its 23-year-old co-founder and CEO Evan Spiegel was reported to have turned down an offer from Facebook of $3 billion (£1.9 billion) for his young firm.

Anchorage man charged with harassment after creating fake Facebook accounts. [ Anchorage Dispatch, by Jerzy Shedlock, January 4, 2014 ].

The alleged online bully didn’t stop with the social media accounts, which included Facebook and Google+. The sisters did a simple search of their names and “were shocked to find numerous places where photos of themselves had been posted to adult photo-sharing websites,” the charges against Hoehne say.

Anchorage Police Department investigator tracked the man through IP addresses, which identify how computers are communicating over a network, and emails. All digital evidence trails led to the disgruntled roommate, a man who allegedly had an unhealthy sexual fixation involving the victim.

Charges filed on New Year’s Eve detail the high-speed Internet chase that started in late August, when the victim told police that Hoehne had downloaded photos of her, some nude, from her computer without permission and used them to make the fake accounts. She said Hoehne also posted ads claiming she was an escort or prostitute and “enjoyed different explicit sex acts with strangers,” the charges say. She said her sister suffered similar online harassment.

Cyberbullying among adults: Rare or underreported?

What the victim experienced is hard to define. She was harassed online. Her reputation is in question. It’s a type of cyberbullying taken to the extreme.

Alaska law protects against criminals intent on harassing or annoying another person, according to the harassment statute’s language. One section of the law says the criminal charge is applicable if a person “makes an anonymous or obscene telephone call, an obscene electronic communication, or a telephone call or electronic communication that threatens physical injury or sexual contact.” A crime has been committed if someone “publishes or distributes electronic or printed photographs, pictures, or films that show the genitals, anus, or female breast of the other person or show that person engaged in a sexual act.”

But data collected on cyberbullying focuses on middle and high school students, an age when many teens start to define themselves and establish their digital identities. One of the leading entities gathering such data is the Cyberbullying Research Center. According to a summary of its research from 2004-2013, 24 percent of middle and high school students have been a victim of the online form of bullying, generally defined as someone sending electronic messages in an intimidating or threatening manner.

Schools across Alaska have added protections for students against cyberbullying in recent years. Some hold presentations by school resource officers to teach kids about the social and psychological effects of such harassment.

The center’s site offers advice for adults who fall victim to cyberbullying but no statistics. Among the tips: don’t retaliate in a similar fashion, contact law enforcement and get an attorney.

Another organization that fights online harassment through education is WHO@, Working to Halt Online Abuse. The organization started in 1997, when online chat rooms and instant messengers were growing in popularity.

Still, it doesn’t track cases of adult cyberbullying. Instead, it collects cyberstalking statistics, online harassment that may include sending threatening emails. It found that 36 percent of cyberstalking victims are 18-30 years old, 38 percent are 30-40 years old and 26 percent are 41 or older. And 80 percent of those victims are female; 63 percent of the victims had a prior relationship with their harasser, according to the group’s data.

Co-director of the Cyberbullying Research Center Jonathan Patchin told the Washington Post in October that adult harassment occurs far more often than people realize. It’s visible in vile comments on sites like Twitter and comment threads under online news articles, he said.

Hundreds of images, hundreds of charges

Hoehne and the victim lived together for a few years. That’s until summer 2011, when the two allegedly fell out when she confronted Hoehne and his family about numerous pieces of underwear she found hidden in his bed, the charges say.

She moved out shortly after the fight and has had very little contact with him since, the woman told police.

But in August, the woman’s sister brought the fake Facebook accounts to her attention. The page shared posts of nude photos, some of herself that’d been stolen from her computer. She later described her former roommate as computer savvy and said when they lived together, she asked Hoehne to do some work on her computer. The victim also said Hoehne was aware of the photos but did not have permission to view, let alone share the pictures.

The sister quickly deleted her Facebook account after its discovery but Hoehne’s former roommate left hers open. After finding more sites and more photos — some of the sisters’ faces superimposed over other women having sex, with captions like “a couple of craigslist dates,” “working the bars in downtown Anchorage” and “(victims’ first and last name) likes to let people watch” — she went to police.

All the investigator had to do to call up the pictures was Google the sisters’ names, the charges say. Adding variations of “Alaska” and “Anchorage” got numerous hits on them.

The Anchorage police officer found the photos on one discovered blog originated from two accounts, one of which is “danellehone.” To make matters more bizarre, in Hoehne’s profile picture he’s decked out in his former roommate’s clothes and jewelry, the charges say.

A look at the fake Google+ account found references to the victim’s family and personal life, details only Hoehne would be aware of, the charges say.

Search warrants from multiple accounts were granted, and the officer connected the profiles to Hoehne’s personal emails, which also allegedly had stored photos of the sisters. All together, the officer documented 372 separate posts that actually were the victim or purported to be one of the sisters.

Hoehne faces two charges, the first of which is actually a second-degree theft charge. He has been accused of holding onto the victim’s clothing, jewelry and underwear, as well as a handheld camcorder, valued together at $2,000. It’s alleged he refuses to give it back. The theft charge is a felony.

The 371 harassment counts stem from the hundreds of lewd images posted online, and they are misdemeanors.

Hoehne is in custody in Anchorage on $10,000 bail.

Stop Bullying: Teach Your Child Empathy and Limit Their Intake of Violence. [ Huffington Post, by Mary L. Pulido, 2/1/2014 ].

To my first point, teaching empathy is regularly recommended as a way to help stop bullying. Empathy is the ability to identify and understand another person’s feelings. It’s putting yourself in someone else’s shoes and then extending kindness based on that understanding. Empathy is needed to express care, love and concern, as well as to share times of sadness and despair.

Children who bully often do not understand the impact of their actions, or seem to be immune to the suffering of others. So, helping them develop an empathic capacity should lessen bullying behaviors.

So, how exactly do you teach empathy to your child? Here are a few suggestions:

• Use everyday activities to model empathy. Show your sympathetic feelings towards those who are less fortunate than you, or have recently experienced hardship. If there is a story on the news about someone who lost their home in a fire, or who lost family in a car accident, speak about how sorry you feel and about how that person on the news must feel.

• If a friend or neighbor lost their job, discuss how difficult that will be for that person and the sadness or anxiety they may feel.

• If you see a homeless person, have a conversation with your child about the tragedy and causes of homelessness and why helping at a shelter, donating clothing or money is important.

• Use examples to show your child what they have in common with others. If they can picture the similarities, it’s easier for them to understand others’ feelings. For example, discuss the local impact and devastation of a hurricane, tornado, flood or fire, and how fortunate they are that they are safe. Then, brainstorm about ways that they can help with those impacted.

• Use reports about bullying that appear on the news as discussion points. Too often, they are tragic cases of suicide by a teen who was plagued by bullies. Discuss how that child must have felt, how his/her parents feel now and the ramifications for all involved in the bullying process.

• Model positive, caring behavior. Acts of kindness or concern are a good way to teach your child empathy. Have your child come with you when you bring a meal to your friend who is ill or visit someone in the hospital.

• Praise your child when they display empathic behavior. Give them immediate feedback. “It was so nice of you to help Ms. Smith (an elderly neighbor) with her groceries, she really appreciated it,” or “Thank you so much for hugging your brother when he fell down and cried; you made him feel better.”

Now, to my second point about eliminating the intake of violence from your child’s life, I believe that there is a connection to the increase in bullying behaviors among school-aged children and their constant intake of violence.

Children are constantly exposed to violence on TV, movies the Internet and video games. Often, the perpetrator is viewed as the victor. This constant feed of violence may also make them numb to the suffering of others. It stands to reason that if they are constantly watching movies or playing games whereby those who inflict suffering or death “win” — it works in direct contrast with building empathy.

Be aware of the types of video games, TV shows and movies that your children view; screen them. Remember that besides sending out negative messages about how others should be treated or disputes resolved, these violent images are in their minds forever. ou can’t “unsee” something. Shield them from this unnecessary violence, even if they complain and protest. Have a list of other games, videos, movies, comedies and sports programs that they can enjoy instead. My guess is that they will thank you for it when they are older.

Teens warned on legal consequences of ‘sexting’. [ LowellSun.com, by Dina Samfield, 1/1/2014 ].

Sexting is legally defined as “an act of sending sexually explicit materials through mobile phones.” The messages may be text, photo or video, according to the law.

“It can be a touchy topic, but it is being used by middle-schoolers,” Coniglio said. “If we talk about it, we can help keep it from happening in the first place.”

What many parents do not know is that sending or receiving a sexually suggestive text or image of someone under the age of 18 is considered child pornography and can result in criminal charges.

According to dosomething.org, a nonprofit for young people and social change, among 14- to 24-year-olds who admit to sexting, 29 percent send these messages to people they have never met, but know from the Internet.

Sending semi-nude or nude photos is more common among teen girls, and sexually suggestive messages are more common among boys than girls. Seventeen percent of sexters share the messages they receive with others, and 55 percent of those share them with more than one person.

Teenage girls offered several reasons for sexting: 40 percent do it as a joke, 34 percent do it to feel sexy, and 12 percent feel pressured to do it. Eleven percent of girls ages 13-16 have been involved with sending or receiving sexually explicit messages.

“A lot of kids think it is fun or they are being silly, but if you are allowing your child to have a phone, it is a good idea to have a conversation with your child about this because this is a serious crime,” Coniglio said.

Parents who allow their children to have cellphones should set rules for their use and discuss what sort of information and images are appropriate to share via text, Coniglio said.

“You can block images from being received and sent,” she said, adding that if children show they can handle having a phone, parents can give them a little more flexibility.

“Know what safeguards are available on your child’s phone, such as turning off and/or blocking texting and picture features,” she said. “Think about what would happen if your child were charged with passing pornography — how it affects your future. Talk to your child about it.”

Legal ramifications

Some consequences of being charged with the crime include denial of college admission, ineligibility for student financial aid, restrictions on employment, and restrictions on where you live.

Ayer Patrol Officer Jennifer Bigelow said there are many cases of kids taking pictures at age 10 or 11, “and then they come back up. Someone will post it and it will be affiliated with certain schools.”

She said that fortunately, in Massachusetts, there is a Juvenile Diversion Program that works with first-time juvenile offenders ages 7-17. It offers an alternative to the juvenile court system. In that case, the charge would not go on the offender’s criminal record.

But, she warned, “once a sex offender, you are a sex offender for life.”

Even a person who takes a photo of himself or herself can be charged with the dissemination of pornography.

“A lot of girls take shots of themselves, and even if no face is shown, the word gets out and then it goes online. It’s not just between cellphones, but it can show up in India and places all over the world we don’t know about, and the kids know more than we do and pick up new things, so it’s hard to track,” Bigelow said.

“We don’t want to charge a child,” said Shirley police Sgt. Alfreda Cromwell, “but the DA wants to know. It is really about helping them,” she said of youthful offenders.

In response to a question about whether parents are liable for their children’s cellphone activities, Coniglio suggested that anything parents see that is questionable should be reported right away.

“The key here is prevention,” she said. “Talk with your children beforehand and let them know what can happen as a result. A phone really is a handheld computer, so it is hard to control. Monitoring is key, but dialogue is more important, because you can’t control every time your child is going on the Internet.”

Young people are sexting – but that doesn’t mean they necessarily want to be, says research. [ The Independent, by Antonia Molloy, 6/1/2014 ].

More than half (52.3 per cent) of young adults have engaged in “ unwanted but consensual sexting with a committed partner”, according to research to be published in February in the journalComputers in Human Behaviour.

Most did so for flirtation, foreplay, to fulfil a partner’s needs, or for intimacy, but women were more likely to consent to unwanted sexting because of anxieties about their relationships.

The research, which was carried out by scientists at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), polled 155 undergraduates in committed relationships on their sexting habits.

Fifty-five per cent of the female respondents said they had previously engaged in unwanted sexting, while 48 per cent of men had done the same.

The results show similarities between sexual behaviour online and off: in both cases, couples will willingly go along with sex, even when they do not feel like it, from reasons ranging from satisfying their partner to avoiding an argument.

But while women are often considered to engage in unwanted sex more than men, the research shows only a small difference in the number of men and women partaking in unwanted sexting.

The authors of the article argued “gender-role expectations” could be to blame. Men might be more likely to agree to undesired sexting because doing so is “relatively easy and does not require them to invest more into the relationship,” while women might be discouraged from virtual sex because it fails to help them attain their relationship “goals”.

The survey also showed that people who were anxious about their relationships were more likely to send begrudging sexts, in a bid to alleviate fears about alienation or abandonment by their partners.

When sibling rivalry becomes bullying [Parentdish, by Katie Hilpern, December 2013 ].

It’s an issue that Corinna Tucker of the University of New Hampshire feels passionately about. As the lead author of a new study for the American journal Pediatrics, she found that almost a third of children said they had been victim to sibling aggression during the past year. That’s more than the number of kids who have been bullied at school, which studies show affects up to a quarter of children.

The aggression can take many forms, says Tucker, including theft, psychological abuse and physical assault.

“It’s not just younger children,” she adds. “Our study questioned both children and adolescents. This is significant because many parents assume sibling fights are over by the teenage years.”

“I’m so scared of my brother,” one 15-year-old girl recently told ChildLine. “He pushes me, shouts at me and sometimes even hits me. Mum and Dad don’t do anything to stop it. I cry almost every night and am so angry with everyone. Sometimes I want to disappear.”

Tucker found that even one act of aggression in a whole year can lead to mental distress, although – as you’d expect – the more incidents of aggression, the greater the link. “By mental distress, I mean depression, anger and anxiety,” she explains.

Even mild incidents can have an impact. “This finding was something that took people by surprise – the fact that even mild experiences, such as being called names or being on the receiving end of mean words, can leave young people feeling mentally distressed.”

If you think about it, the home is the perfect breeding ground for bullying, says Tucker. Not only do children live together for a long time, but there’s usually an imbalance intellectually and in terms of physical power. Plus, siblings often experience jealousy, as well as often competing for parents’ attention. The relationship is emotionally intense too and is one of those where you can love and hate someone all at the same time.

In fact, other studies show that siblings can be both a bully and a victim, probably helping to explain why it’s often not picked up by parents.

Other reasons it remains a well hidden problem is that parents often seem to expect their children to fight with one another, says Tucker.

“Many parents think it’s OK for one of their children to hit a sibling on the head, but not a friend. Why is that? It’s like parents have these different norms of acceptability and that’s what I’d like to see change.”

What’s more, she says, some parents actually think it’s healthy when they see their children failing to get on.

“You hear parents say things like, ‘Sibling relationships are the first place kids learn how to get along with people’ and ‘Not getting on with his brother will certainly teach him how to handle difficult situations in life.’ But what they’re missing is that many of these kids are suffering mental distress as a result.”

Although Tucker’s study didn’t look at the long-term effects of sibling bullying, anecdotal evidence suggests they can be serious and life-long, with many people blaming their parents for ignoring the issue.

“I know my mum and dad saw my sister constantly saying the most awful things to me, things that exacerbated my eating problems during my adolescence, but I think they felt overwhelmed by it and chose to ignore it,” says Rachel, 35.

“I’ve had to go into therapy because of the impact it’s had and I can’t help feeling most angry of all at my parents, who should have stepped in and protected me.”

But with few sibling groups getting on all the time, the line between normal discord and bullying is hard to spot for parents.

Watch for patterns developing over time and be sure to talk to your child if you feel he or she may be at risk, advises Tucker. If they won’t open up to you, find someone else, perhaps a counsellor.
Never belittle any bullying behaviour, she adds. Learning to recognise that it’s just as serious as school bullying is critical.

“Don’t have different rules for inside and outside the home. It’s that simple.”

Sue Minto, head of ChildLIne, agrees. “All bullying should be taken seriously and it is important to recognise the significant impact it can have on children. To be bullied at home by a sibling also means that for the child being bullied, home may not feel like a safe place. It could be that a parent would underestimate the impact on their child and it is important that we recognise that bullying by a sibling can be every bit as damaging as bullying outside of the home.”

Work on prevention too, says Tucker. “All parents owe it to their kids to focus on conflict resolution. I mean, people are quick toteach their kids athletic and academic skills, but not relationship skills and even when they do, this sibling area is often ignored. You couldn’t go to school or to work and just hit someone, so why is it OK at home? Teach your children how to resolve fights through mutual problem solving and respectful talking.”

There is often a general assumption that kids need to sort themselves out in the home, says Jeremy Todd, head of Family Lives, the parenting support charity “But that’s really unhelpful.”

Todd adds that parents must be consistent in how they respond to their different children’s needs in order to try and avoid, or at least minimise, jealousy.

“Each child will benefit from different types of activities and attention. This also helps in showing that no one person has a monopoly on your attention and is more important or able to gain more attention or manipulate you.”

If a parent instinctively feels something is wrong in their children’s relationship, act on it, he advises. “If you don’t, this can be a damaging and lifelong experience, not just for the victim but the bully too.”

Indeed, Rachel, 39, who reports that both verbal and physical agression dominated her relationship with her brother right up until her mid-teens, says, “My brother was physically aggressive, but I more than made up for it with my nasty remarks – remarks that I believe have helped lead him into a life of drug problems. He doesn’t speak to me now and I can’t seem to forgive myself. Sometimes it eats me up inside.”

Irish Govt forms new internet safety group to protect children. [ Silicon Republic, by John Kennedy, 29/11/2013 ].

The Advisory Group, which will be chaired by Dr Brian O’Neill of the Dublin Institute of Technology, will have regard to international best practice, including recent European Commission Reports and Council Conclusions in this area, and will also be asked to comment specifically on the recent report of the Joint Oireachtas Committee titled ‘Addressing the Growth of Social Media and tackling Cyberbullying’.

Other members of the group include cyber psychologist Mary Aiken, director of the UCD Centre for Cyber Security Professor Joe Carthy, CEO of the National Parents Council Aine Lynch, UPC’s head of regulatory and public policy Kate O’Sullivan and telecoms law barrister Ronan Lupton.

The Group will be asked to produce specific recommendations on the appropriateness of existing regulatory and legislative frameworks around electronic communications, internet governance and the sharing of material online and as to the most appropriate relationship should be between ISPs, online service providers, the State and citizens in relation to access to legal material and bullying and harassment online.

“Fundamental to their work is the question of striking an appropriate balance in policy terms that ensures the protection of children and young people but does not limit their opportunities and rights online,” Minister Rabbitte said.

Four in 10 children have been victim of bullying in past year. [ Irish Independent, by Ralph Riegal, 24/12/2014 ].

The survey comes as the Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (ISPCC) said it now hopes all primary schools nationwide will use their anti-bullying education kit.

The ISPCC kit, ‘Shield My School’, helps schools to evaluate the effectiveness of their anti-bullying measures.

Under new Department of Education guidelines, schools need to have anti-bullying policies in place that are regularly assessed as to their effectiveness.

The kit also helps schools to understand the importance of a prompt, effective response to any bullying issues.

The kit is already in use in Dublinand is now being rolled out to schools across Cork.

The ISPCC said it hopes all Irish schools will make use of the kit, which was developed in response to the over 9,000 calls received by the charity in 2012 in relation to bullying.

An ISPCC survey has found that:

* Forty per cent of nine-year-olds had encountered some form of bullying over the previous 12 months.

* Twenty-two per cent of primary schoolchildren said they had been bullied at some time.

* Twenty-six per cent of secondary schoolchildren said they had been bullied or knew someone who had been bullied.

ISPCC volunteer Maggie Mulpeter said it was vital that all interest groups worked together to minimise bullying.

“We believe there is a need for a concerted effort nationwide to work in partnership with schools, parents and communities to reduce incidents of bullying,” she said.

Ireland South MEP Sean Kelly (FG) said the issue of cyber-bullying was now one of the European Parliament‘s policy priorities.

Mr Kelly backs tough new regulation proposals aimed at controlling abusive online content and tightening the responsibilities of website providers.

The proposals will also enhance co-operation between EU member states, given that cyber-bullying is now seen as a cross-border issue.

It is hoped the new regulations can come into force by 2014/15.

The issue of bullying and, in particular, that of cyber-bullying has been highlighted by a number of high-profile tragedies in Ireland.

The deaths of Donegal teen Erin Gallagher (13) and Leitrim teen Ciara Pugsley (15) in 2012 were both linked to sick bullying on the Latvian-based www.ask.fm social media site.

Erin’s sister, Shannon (15), took her own life two months after her sister’s death.

Church of Ireland Bishop of Cork, Cloyne and Ross, Dr Paul Colton, briefly suspended his Twitter account last year after what he described as “depressing” attacks by anonymous internet ‘trolls’.

CALLS FOR ANTI-BULLYING POLICY IN LEITRIM SCHOOLS [Ocean FM, December 2013 ].

That’s according to Leitrim Cllr John McCartin who says as the current climate of anonymous internet communication intensifies it is crucial that everyone is made aware of the damagers of cyber bullying.

Bully4u is a provider of anti-bullying service for schools and the workplace.

Cllr McCartin is calling on Leitrim County Council to formally invite all schools in the county to engage with bully4u or a similar programme.